ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Bacteriophage-Based Therapeutic, Diagnostic, and Biocontrol Platforms: Engineering, Evidence, and Translational Challenges.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacteriophages are being revisited as programmable platforms for therapy, diagnostics, and biocontrol. Their value, however, depends on the setting. Therapeutic phages must do more than lyse bacteria in vitro: they need to reach infection sites, persist long enough to act, reduce bacterial burden, and limit resistance under clinically relevant conditions. Diagnostic platforms are judged by another standard, including sensitivity, specificity, matrix tolerance, and stable signal readout. Food, agricultural, and environmental applications instead rely on formulation stability, host specificity, scalable delivery, and ecological safety. This review summarizes the biological and engineering principles that support phage-based platforms, and then evaluates therapeutic, diagnostic, and nonclinical uses through an application-specific evidence framework. For therapy, we focus on evidence hierarchy, active phage exposure, immune clearance, persistence, infection spread, and host-resistance-bypass phenotypes. Recent studies on high-persistence and hyper-aggressive phages suggest that dissemination, plaque expansion, and resistance-bypass behavior should be considered during early candidate selection. Phage cocktails, antibiotic combinations, and engineered phages remain useful, but they should be treated as adaptive strategies rather than universal solutions. Overall, phage technologies require validation frameworks that link biological function with manufacturing quality, regulatory feasibility, and meaningful clinical or environmental endpoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.