ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Microfluidic Fibroblast Cell Culture Chip for Embryo Co-Culture: Analysis of Preimplantation Embryo Viability and Development Potential.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Preimplantation embryo development requires a tightly regulated microenvironment that is not fully reproduced by conventional static culture. We developed a polydimethylsiloxane-based microfluidic embryo co-culture platform integrating compartmentalized architecture with dynamic perfusion to simulate physiological conditions. The study included two stages. First, NIH/3T3 mouse fibroblasts were evaluated as helper cells under three culture conditions after transition to embryo culture medium. Helper-cell viability in the dynamic chip was 84.72%, compared with 71.91% after manual medium replacement in 24-well plates and 94.27% in the 24-well control group. Second, mouse embryos were cultured under four conditions: conventional 24-well plates, static microfluidic chip culture with co-culture, dynamic microfluidic chips without co-culture, and dynamic microfluidic chip co-culture. Blastocyst formation rates were 100.0% (9/9), 0.0% (0/6), 33.3% (3/9), and 55.5% (5/9), respectively. Because no inferential statistical analysis was performed, these proportions are interpreted descriptively. Nevertheless, the blastocyst formation in the microfluidic co-culture group supports the technical feasibility of integrating dynamic perfusion and helper-cell co-culture within a single platform. Further optimization and validation are required. This platform provides a foundation for future development of advanced embryo culture technologies including patient-specific endometrial co-culture systems in assisted reproduction, disease modeling, or drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.