ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
A Metabolism-Guided Framework for Selecting Structural Modification or Nano-Delivery Strategies for Oral Rutin.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rutin is a flavonoid glycoside with well-documented antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities in preclinical models, but its oral bioavailability is poor due to extensive presystemic metabolism. Following oral administration, intact rutin reaches the colon largely unabsorbed, where gut microbiota convert it to quercetin aglycone, which is further metabolized to circulating conjugated metabolites and local phenolic acid derivatives. Accumulating evidence, derived predominantly from preclinical studies, suggests this metabolic activation can be usefully conceptualized as a microbiota-activated prodrug system. This challenges conventional formulation strategies that only increase parent compound exposure. In this review, we propose a metabolism-oriented conceptual framework for oral rutin delivery design. We compare nano-delivery systems and structural modifications strategies across pharmacokinetics, metabolic regulation, safety, manufacturability, and translational feasibility. Nano-delivery systems are functionally reclassified into four absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion (ADME) -oriented categories based on their primary pharmacokinetic objectives. While numerous preclinical studies report improved bioavailability and efficacy, human metabolite-resolved pharmacokinetic data remain extremely limited, and no European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) -authorized health claims exist for rutin. This review provides a new conceptual framework for selecting oral rutin delivery strategies based on metabolic objectives rather than solely on improving solubility or systemic exposure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.