ArticleBiology2026
Photovoltaic Microhabitats Reorganize Vegetation and Soil Carbon Pools in an Alpine Dryland Grassland.
Article in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Utility-scale ground-mounted photovoltaic development is expanding across alpine dryland grasslands, creating engineered microhabitats with contrasting shading regimes, surface exposure, and soil hydro-physical conditions. Microhabitat-specific responses of vegetation and soil carbon pools remain poorly quantified in these systems. We assessed carbon-pool responses in the Talatan photovoltaic park on the northeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau using 109 plot-level observations across five microhabitats: reference grassland (REF), fixed-panel shaded microhabitat (FS), fixed-panel interspace microhabitat (FI), horizontal single-axis tracking microhabitat (HSA), and tilted single-axis tracking microhabitat (TSA). We estimated aboveground biomass carbon (AGB-C), belowground biomass carbon (BGB-C), 0-30 cm soil organic carbon stock (SOC stock), and total ecosystem carbon storage (TEC). Microhabitat contrasts were evaluated relative to REF, and standardized association models were used to examine relationships between SOC stock, soil moisture, soil fines, and vegetation carbon pools. Carbon responses differed by microhabitat position and carbon-pool compartment. FS showed the clearest vegetation carbon contrast, with AGB-C 29.2% lower than REF and BGB-C 29.8% lower with borderline statistical support. In contrast, FS showed smaller, more uncertain contrasts for SOC stock (-3.2%) and TEC (-6.3%). The SOC stock association model explained 46% of the variance, with positive coefficients for soil moisture (β = 0.496), soil fines (β = 0.256), AGB-C (β = 0.239), and BGB-C (β = 0.171). These findings indicate that photovoltaic carbon assessment in alpine dryland grasslands should distinguish microhabitat position, carbon-pool compartment, and soil hydro-physical background to identify where carbon responses occur and through which carbon pools they are expressed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.