Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42589132›Full record

ArticleBiology2026

Turrill's Omega: A Heuristic Index for Quantifying the Support of a Taxonomic Hypothesis.

Lorenzo Peruzzi, Jacopo Franzoni, Antonio Giacò

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lorenzo PeruzziPLANTSEED Lab, Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Via Derna 1, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9008-273X
Jacopo FranzoniPLANTSEED Lab, Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Via Derna 1, 56126 Pisa, Italy.
Antonio GiacòPLANTSEED Lab, Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Via Derna 1, 56126 Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8263-6018

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological research relies on the use of taxa, with species expressed in the form of a Latin binomial. Although taxa are commonly regarded as established entities, they actually represent hypotheses on the distribution of natural biological variation and may change their status as new systematic knowledge becomes available. A long-standing problem affecting systematics and taxonomy, with important consequences for other biological disciplines, is that a binomial itself conveys no information about the strength of the taxonomic hypothesis it represents. Here, we introduce the concept of a standardized heuristic index, named Turrill's Omega Index (TOI), to estimate the degree of support for a taxonomic hypothesis. Turrill's Omega Index is a single numerical value calculated by integrating four macro-categories of comparative data: Phenotype, Genealogy, Isolation, and Geography-Ecology. Turrill's Omega Index provides a practical and reliable framework for quantifying the support for a taxonomic hypothesis, without requiring resolution of the long-standing debate surrounding species delimitation and species concepts. Accordingly, it has the potential to represent a valuable and transformative advance in systematics and taxonomy. In addition, TOI can support conservation decision-making by helping prioritize funding allocation among equally threatened taxa according to their degree of support.

Indexed as

biodiversityspecies hypothesissystematicstaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID42589132
PMCPMC13464593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.