ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluates whether different fat formulations of cow's milk replacers (CMRs) for calves, made by replacing palm and coconut oils with
methodsThree commercial isoenergetic and isonitrogenous milk replacers, which differed only in the fat source, were tested over ten weeks: CMR C (80/20 palm/coconut oil), CMR T20 (80/20 palm/insect oil), and CMR T40 (60/40 palm/insect oil). Twenty-four calves were randomly assigned to three groups. Feces samples were collected individually at 65-69 days of age.
resultsThe feed efficiency and the apparent digestion of nutrients did not differ significantly among the groups. However, the T20 group tended to have a lower dry matter intake than the C group and lower average body weight than the T40 group.
conclusionsBlack soldier fly oil did not impair apparent nutrient digestibility or feed efficiency at weaning. However, the T20 formulation was associated with reduced solid feed intake and lower average body weight compared with those for T40, indicating that formulation and optimal inclusion level require further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.