Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42588939›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Hierarchical Coordination and Institutional Improvement of China's Laboratory Animal Welfare Standard System.

Wenlong Zhao, Baolong Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wenlong ZhaoDrug Safety Evaluation Center, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin 150006, China.
Baolong LiDrug Safety Evaluation Center, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine, Harbin 150006, China.

Funding

Heilongjiang Provincial Science and Technology Department LH2023H056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecological civilization refers to the harmonious development of humanity and nature, with its core essence lying in respecting nature and rejecting "anthropocentrism"-a concept that aligns perfectly with the principles of animal protection. The protection of laboratory animals, which are most closely tied to human scientific progress, is particularly crucial. For centuries, laboratory animals have served as substitutes and models for humans, treated merely as tools. With the advancement of humanitarianism, however, the protection of laboratory animal welfare has gradually gained greater attention. China has established a system for protecting the welfare of laboratory animals through foundational laws and tiered standards, translating internationally recognized animal protection concepts-such as the "3Rs" principle and the Five Freedoms-into actionable operational requirements, thereby implementing concrete measures to safeguard the welfare of laboratory animals. However, China's relevant standards still face issues such as insufficient enforcement and a lack of mandatory provisions. To safeguard the welfare and rights of laboratory animals, China must integrate animal welfare into the development of an ecological civilization, improve laws and regulations, strengthen talent development, promote technological innovation, and establish a comprehensive system of standards to ensure the welfare of laboratory animals.

Indexed as

3R principlelaboratory animal welfarestandardwelfare and ethics review

Identifiers

PMID42588939
PMCPMC13463493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.