ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Fine-Tuning Mepiquat Chloride Application in Soybean: Interactive Effects of Concentration and Growth Stage on Photosynthetic Apparatus, Carbohydrate Metabolism, and Grain Yield.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soybean is an important protein source, economic crop, and strategic agricultural product, which is related to nutrition and health, industrial development, and food security. Mepiquat chloride (MC) can influence yield, but its effectiveness depends on application timing and concentration. We hypothesized that optimal MC application enhances photosynthetic efficiency and carbohydrate metabolism, thereby increasing yield. A pot experiment was conducted using two cultivars (HN44, HN65) with four MC concentrations (50-400 mg/L) applied at seedling (V3), flowering (R1), or both stages (V3 + R1). Dry matter, photosynthesis, carbohydrates, and yield were evaluated. MC significantly altered dry matter partitioning; 200 mg/L at seedling stage increased total dry matter in HN65 at R6. MC enhanced net photosynthetic rate and PSII efficiency in a concentration-dependent manner, particularly improving photoprotective capacity in HN65. Leaf carbohydrate accumulation was also affected. Yield gains were stage- and cultivar-specific: seedling-stage 200 mg/L increased grain weight per plant in HN65, while flowering-stage 50 mg/L was most effective for HN44. Combined applications (200-400 mg/L) produced the highest yields for both cultivars. This is the first comparative evidence that HN44 and HN65 exhibit divergent yield responses to MC timing-HN44 benefits from flowering-stage, HN65 from seedling-stage application. Optimizing MC concentration and timing enhances yield by modulating photosynthesis and assimilate partitioning in a cultivar-dependent manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.