ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Partial Reproducibility and Pleiotropic Epigenetic QTLs in
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unlike conventional genetic polymorphisms, many induced epigenetic polymorphisms can be reset across generations, raising uncertainty about how consistently the same epigenetic loci and associated phenotypic effects can be recovered among independent studies. To address this problem, we designed our study specifically to maximize a lineage-matched, environmentally aligned cross-study comparability with the foundational work of Cortijo et al. by using seeds derived from the same epiRIL generation and grown under broadly similar environmental conditions. We mapped flowering time, as well as five non-flowering traits that had not previously been mapped in this epiRIL population: rosette diameter, basal branch number, lateral branch number, fruit number, and rosette leaf number. We detected significant epiQTLs for all traits except lateral branch number. We also reproduced a facsimile of the original computational pipeline. This design provides an approximate upper bound on expected reproducibility before additional generations of methylation resetting or divergence among seed stocks could substantially influence the results. We recovered two of Cortijo et al.'s previously reported epiQTLs, failed to recover another, and found a different one, with power analyses suggesting that the discrepancies may reflect statistical power. Within overlapping epiQTL intervals across the five traits that had significant intervals, we identified 69 candidate genes exhibiting gene body methylation. Overall, our results reproduced some but not all previous epiQTL signals when comparisons were made using closely matched source material under similar conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.