Comparative Multi-Omics Analysis of Rhizome Shooting in

Xin Zhao, Man Tang, Yanwen Zhao, Mengqiu Chen, Xiaojun Wang, Qi Lin, Zhijian Long, Shanglian Hu

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xin ZhaoCollege of Life Science and Agri-Forestry, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621000, China.

Man TangCollege of Life Science and Agri-Forestry, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621000, China.

Yanwen ZhaoCollege of Life Science and Agri-Forestry, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621000, China.

Mengqiu ChenCollege of Life Science and Agri-Forestry, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621000, China.

Xiaojun WangThe Conservation of Endangered Wildlife Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Academy of Giant Panda, Chengdu 610000, China.

Qi LinThe Conservation of Endangered Wildlife Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Academy of Giant Panda, Chengdu 610000, China.

Zhijian LongCollege of Life Science and Agri-Forestry, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621000, China.

Shanglian HuCollege of Life Science and Agri-Forestry, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621000, China.

Funding

Sichuan Forestry and Grassland Technology Innovation Team CXTD2026009

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bamboo shoots, as the most nutritionally valuable food source for giant pandas during key reproductive seasons, are critical for conservation because their availability and timing directly influence panda foraging and habitat use. However, the molecular mechanisms through which altitudinal temperature variation governs rhizome shooting in staple food bamboos remain largely unknown. Here, we performed integrated metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses of

Indexed as

altitudinal gradientFargesia rufaintegrated metabolomics and transcriptomicsrhizome shootingsoil temperature

Identifiers

PMID42588806

DOI10.3390/plants15152302

PMCPMC13468535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.