ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Cyanobacterial Circadian Clock: Molecular Mechanisms and Physiological Outputs.
Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Earth's rotation produces day and night cycles that are a primary selective pressure driving the evolution of endogenous circadian clocks. Cyanobacteria are the most studied prokaryotic model, and their timekeeping core is a protein oscillator composed of KaiA, KaiB, and KaiC. This oscillator sustains a near-24 h rhythm independently of transcription-translation feedback, challenging the long-standing assumption that prokaryotes merely respond passively to environmental cues. Moreover, it offers unique insights into the evolution and operational logic of circadian clocks. This review summarizes advances in cyanobacterial circadian research. We first analyze the KaiABC oscillator's molecular basis, including synergistic conformational changes, phosphorylation and dephosphorylation cascades, and temperature compensation, which confer robustness and tunability. We compare oscillator compositions across cyanobacterial lineages, showing evolutionary plasticity. We then outline input and output networks, clarifying how environmental signals reset the oscillator phase and how temporal information is relayed to downstream processes. We further explain how the clock coordinates photosynthesis, nitrogen fixation, respiration, and cell division through predictive regulation, temporal decoupling, and resource prioritization, thereby resolving metabolic conflicts and enhancing fitness under light and dark cycles. This framework provides a theoretical basis for microbial survival strategies in fluctuating environments and offers insights for synthetic biology circuit design. Finally, we discuss open questions, including coupling between the oscillator and the cell cycle, functional divergence among ecotypes, and roles at the community level. Further research on the cyanobacterial clock will help clarify general principles of biological timing and its evolutionary origins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.