Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42588790›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Wheat Biofortification for Enhancing Iron, Zinc, and Protein: The Role of Mutation Breeding.

Gulina Doktyrbay, Saule Atabayeva, Saltanat Asrandina, Sabina Shoinbekova, Aigerim Zhaxybayeva, Nurgul Amangeldi, Azamat Zhaxybayev, Malika Abdulzhanova, Xiaodong Liang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gulina DoktyrbayDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-3032-6373
Saule AtabayevaDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan.
Saltanat AsrandinaDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan.
Sabina ShoinbekovaDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan.
Aigerim ZhaxybayevaDepartment of Chemistry, Institute of Natural Sciences, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National Univeristy, Astana 010008, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-1071-3616
Nurgul AmangeldiDepartment of Pre-University Education, Farabi University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-6850-821X
Azamat ZhaxybayevDepartment of Biology, School of Sciences and Humanities, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0009-0001-2126-449X
Malika AbdulzhanovaDepartment of Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-7751-2256
Xiaodong LiangInstitute of Crop Research, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofortification of wheat has emerged as a sustainable strategy to combat global micronutrient deficiencies, particularly iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) deficiency, while simultaneously improving grain protein quality. Among available approaches, mutation breeding has gained renewed attention as a non-transgenic tool capable of generating novel genetic variability for nutritional enhancement. This review is based on a comprehensive analysis of peer-reviewed literature retrieved from major scientific databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and Google Scholar. Studies published between 2005 and 2025 were critically evaluated to compare the effectiveness, advantages, limitations, and future prospects of wheat biofortification approaches. This review critically evaluates the role of mutation breeding in wheat biofortification and compares its effectiveness with conventional breeding, agronomic biofortification, and genome editing technologies. Evidence from published studies indicates that gamma-induced mutant lines have achieved significant increases in grain Fe and Zn concentrations, as well as improvements in storage protein composition, without regulatory constraints associated with transgenic methods. However, variability in genetic stability, potential yield penalties, and genotype × environment interactions remain important limitations. Overall, integrating mutation breeding with advanced molecular tools and agronomic practices offers a promising strategy for developing nutrient-enriched wheat varieties and enhancing global food and nutritional security.

Indexed as

agronomic traitsbioavailabilitygamma irradiationgenome editinghidden hungerinduced mutagenesismicronutrient enrichmentnutritional quality

Identifiers

PMID42588790
PMCPMC13468071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.