ReviewCancers2026
Mapping Misconceptions in Neuroendocrine Tumor Nomenclature: A Scoping Review of National Database Studies and Clinical Implications.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2010, the World Health Organization (WHO) standardized neuroendocrine neoplasm terminology, dividing these tumors by differentiation into well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. Registries such as the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program and the National Cancer Database (NCDB) store legacy codes predating this framework, raising concern that registry-based research carries nomenclature errors into the clinical literature. We performed a scoping review of research published in 2012-2022 that used SEER and/or the NCDB to study gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, charting 170 articles (from 1079 citations) against the 2010 classification, with forward citation analysis (OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar) measuring downstream citation exposure. Of 141 assessable studies, 88% (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.