ReviewCancers2026
Functional Outcomes and Anti-Reflux Performance of Reconstruction Methods Following Proximal Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proximal gastrectomy preserves gastric function; however, reconstruction choice influences reflux control and quality of life (QOL), and the comparative efficacy of available techniques remains unclear. A PRISMA-guided search of PubMed and Web of Science Core Collection (January 2000-April 2025) identified studies reporting reflux or QOL outcomes after proximal gastrectomy. Eligible studies included adult gastric cancer cohorts with original clinical data. Two reviewers independently screened articles, extracted predefined variables, and performed a narrative synthesis. The protocol was archived on the OSF. Thirty-two studies (2958 patients) met inclusion criteria. Simple esophagogastrostomy (EG) consistently demonstrated the poorest reflux control and widest range of stricture rates. Double-tract reconstruction (DTR) showed a generally favorable balance among reflux control, low leakage rates, and acceptable stricture rates, suggesting that it may represent a practical and broadly applicable reconstruction option. Jejunal interposition and pouch variants were reported in small, heterogeneous series, limiting their generalizability. Among valve-forming methods, the double-flap technique was associated with very low rates of endoscopic reflux in two Los Angeles-graded cohorts, though a 4-6% stricture rate remained a concern. Evidence for the side overlap with fundoplication by Yamashita, both original and modified, was sparse and inconsistent. Global QOL, assessed using PGSAS-45/37 and EORTC instruments, did not differ consistently between reconstruction types, although specific domains-such as appetite loss, nausea, and weight maintenance-varied sporadically. Available evidence suggests that DTR may be considered a practical and broadly applicable reconstruction option following proximal gastrectomy, whereas the double-flap technique appears to provide strong reflux control but may be associated with a risk of anastomotic stricture. Simple EG may was associated with higher reflux rates across studies and may be less favorable for reflux control. Larger multicenter studies using standardized, nutrition-sensitive QOL measures and physiological reflux testing are needed to optimize reconstruction choice. However, substantial heterogeneity and the limited quality of the available evidence preclude definitive conclusions regarding the superiority of any single reconstruction method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.