ReviewCancers2026
Hemorrhagic Complications in Gastric Cancer: Current Evidence and Multidisciplinary Management Strategies.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hemorrhage is a clinically important emergency in gastric cancer, occurring in an estimated 3-36% of patients (with the incidence varying substantially by disease stage, tumor morphology, and the operational definition of hemorrhage applied), and potentially becoming life-threatening within 24 h. This review synthesizes evidence from the past two decades to propose a multidisciplinary, stepwise framework for managing gastric cancer-associated bleeding. Endoscopic hemostasis remains the first-line intervention and achieves initial bleeding control in 83-92.9% of cases, although 30-day rebleeding occurs in up to 28-41%. Transcatheter arterial embolization is an important option for persistent bleeding or hemodynamic instability, with a reported clinical success of approximately 72%. Palliative radiotherapy provides effective hemostasis in 68-88.5% of cases, and a biologically effective dose (BED10) exceeding 39 Gy may improve bleeding control. Surgery should be individualized according to disease stage, resectability, physiological reserve, and treatment intent, ranging from emergency vessel ligation to curative resection. Importantly, hemostasis should be regarded not as a final endpoint but as a therapeutic bridge enabling definitive anticancer therapy. Successful bleeding control followed by systemic chemotherapy is associated with improved overall survival. Management therefore requires coordinated decision-making among gastroenterology, interventional radiology, surgery, radiation oncology, and medical oncology teams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.