ReviewCancers2026
When Myeloma Escapes the Bone Marrow: Extramedullary Disease in the Immunotherapy Era.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extramedullary disease (EMD)-the proliferation of clonal plasma cells in soft tissues without direct bone connection-represents one of the most challenging manifestations of multiple myeloma, associated with aggressive biology, treatment resistance, and poor outcomes. EMD is driven by distinct pathophysiologic mechanisms including downregulation of adhesion molecules, acquisition of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (del(17p), gain(1q)), activation of the RAS-MAPK pathway, epigenetic dysregulation such as EZH2 upregulation, and remodeling of the immune microenvironment toward an immunosuppressive, T-cell-depleted phenotype. Conventional therapies, including anti-CD38-based regimens, yield limited efficacy in EMD, with pooled overall response rates of approximately 20% in triple-class-exposed relapsed/refractory disease. T-cell-redirecting therapies have emerged as the most promising treatment strategy. Both chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies have demonstrated clinically meaningful activity in soft tissue EMD, with CAR T-cell therapy providing the deepest and most durable responses, and dual-targeting bispecific combinations showing particularly encouraging efficacy. Central nervous system (CNS) myeloma, the most devastating form of EMD, has historically carried a dismal prognosis. Emerging retrospective data suggest that both CAR T-cell therapy and bispecific antibodies can achieve meaningful CNS responses with acceptable safety profiles, as part of multimodal approaches incorporating CNS-directed therapies. Despite these advances, EMD remains associated with inferior outcomes even in the immunotherapy era, underscoring the need for strategies targeting the immunosuppressive microenvironment, novel therapeutic approaches, and prospective EMD-focused clinical trials. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the biology, classification, and evolving treatment landscape of both non-CNS and CNS EMD in the era of T-cell-redirecting immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.