Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42588428›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Sustainable Pretreatment of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Biohydrogen Production.

Ioannis Panagiotopoulos, Donald Huisingh, Emmanuel Koukios

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ioannis PanagiotopoulosBioresource Technology Unit, School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Zografou Campus, GR-15700 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0009-0005-7348-6202
Donald HuisinghInstitute for a Secure and Sustainable Environment (ISSE), University of Tennessee, 311 Conference Center Building, Knoxville, TN 37996-4134, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4062-1568
Emmanuel KoukiosBioresource Technology Unit, School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Zografou Campus, GR-15700 Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological hydrogen production from lignocellulosic residues is increasingly recognized as a promising route toward sustainable fuel production. However, efficient conversion of these materials requires appropriate pretreatment strategies to enhance carbohydrate accessibility while preserving the quality of the resulting hydrolysates for fermentation to hydrogen. To date, most pretreatment studies have primarily emphasized maximizing sugar release and biomass fractionation, often overlooking the critical role of hydrolysate quality and hydrogen fermentability. This review evaluates lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment technologies with a specific focus on their impacts on hydrogen fermentability. Among all of the well-studied pretreatments, only a few are good candidates for biohydrogen production from lignocellulosic biomass. In particular, the selection of an optimal pretreatment approach was shown to depend not only on the physicochemical characteristics of the biomass but also upon the metabolic capabilities and substrate utilization patterns of the microorganisms employed. This article highlights the need for integrated optimization of pretreatment and fermentation processes and identifies key challenges and opportunities for advancing lignocellulosic biohydrogen production.

Indexed as

BiofuelsBiomassHydrogenLigninFermentationHydrolysisBiofuelsHydrogenLigninlignocelluloseagricultural residuesbiological hydrogen productionbiomass pretreatmentenergy cropsforestry residueshydrogen yieldthermophilic fermentation

Identifiers

PMID42588428
PMCPMC13467791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.