ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The Role of Emotions in Health Literacy and Patient Education: Trends, Technologies, and Future Opportunities-A Scoping Review.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesHealth literacy and patient education play a key role in supporting informed decision-making, treatment adherence, and disease self-management. While educational interventions have traditionally focused on improving knowledge and understanding, emotions are increasingly recognized as factors associated with learning processes and healthcare experiences. This scoping review mapped the role of emotions in health literacy and patient education by identifying the emotions investigated, assessment methods, technologies employed, educational outcomes, and opportunities for emerging technologies.
methodsA scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR and Joanna Briggs Institute guidance. Searches were finalized in Scopus and PubMed on 6 June 2026, with no publication-date restrictions; only English-language journal articles and reviews were eligible. Two reviewers screened records, extracted data, and classified studies, resolving disagreements by consensus and consulting methodological or clinical co-authors when needed.
resultsA total of 135 studies were included. Anxiety and emotional distress were the most frequently investigated emotional categories, whereas emotional support, reassurance, and emotional engagement received less attention. Interviews, surveys, questionnaires, and standardized scales were the predominant assessment methods. Emotional well-being and understanding were the most frequently reported educational outcomes, followed by adherence, communication, and emotional support. Educational programs and educational materials were the most commonly employed approaches, while digital health solutions appeared less frequently. Limited use of artificial intelligence and objective emotion-recognition methods was identified.
conclusionsEmotional factors were associated with several patient-education outcomes, but the heterogeneous and predominantly self-reported evidence does not establish causality. Emerging technologies warrant further evaluation before their effectiveness, feasibility, and safety in patient education can be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.