ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Occupational Noise in the Central Sterile Supply Department: A Narrative Review of Exposure, Mechanisms, and Control.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Central Sterile Supply Department (CSSD) functions as the critical control point for hospital infection prevention, yet its equipment-intensive environment generates occupational noise exposure that has been systematically overlooked in both the healthcare quality and occupational health literature. We conducted a focused narrative review across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus (up to March 2026) to examine the prevalence, psychophysiological mechanisms, and management of noise in CSSD settings. Four peer-reviewed studies investigating CSSD noise exposure were identified, conducted in Chinese and Brazilian hospitals. The evidence indicates that air guns and pressure steam sterilizers constitute the dominant noise sources, with self-reported exposure associated with psychological symptoms and sleep disturbance in approximately one-quarter of staff. Notably, health concerns may mediate a substantial proportion of the noise-psychology relationship, suggesting a cognitive-affective pathway that may be as theoretically significant as direct physiological damage, although this cross-sectional finding requires longitudinal confirmation. No study has empirically linked CSSD noise to sterilization failures, device damage, or patient-level outcomes. Drawing on this nascent evidence base and adjacent occupational noise theory, we advance three testable propositions: that CSSD noise may constitute a systemic quality risk factor, that subjective cognitive-affective appraisal plays a primary mediating role, and that effective management requires multi-level integration across engineering, administrative, and psychological domains. This review reframes CSSD noise from an ergonomic nuisance to an embedded environmental stressor and charts a structured research agenda for objective measurement, mechanism validation, and intervention evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.