ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Foregrounding Communication Access in Person-Centred Decision Making for People with Motor Neurone Disease: A Narrative Review.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Effective motor neurone disease (MND) management depends on patient and carer involvement in decisions about interventions and future care. Communication and cognitive impairments are common in MND and have under-recognised consequences for shared decision making and autonomy. This narrative conceptual review draws on empirical qualitative research with people living with MND and unpaid family carers and the literature specifically concerning shared decision making and communication in MND. Themes relating to communication, information use, and decision making styles were mapped onto an ALS/MND multidisciplinary decision making model. Enhancements to the model include expanding the decision making context beyond in clinical activity, embedding communication and cognitive skills and accommodations across stages, and acknowledging risks to collaborative decision making. Practical strategies for clinicians, healthcare services, people living with MND, and family carers are proposed to ensure that communication is foregrounded in-person-centred MND care. Observational and implementation research is required to evaluate and refine the proposed approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.