Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42588274›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Foregrounding Communication Access in Person-Centred Decision Making for People with Motor Neurone Disease: A Narrative Review.

Camille Paynter, Susan Mathers, Adam Vogel, Madeline Cruice

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Camille PaynterSchool of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1845-126X
Susan MathersCalvary Health Care Bethlehem, Melbourne, VIC 3162, Australia.
Adam VogelSchool of Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3505-2631
Madeline CruiceSchool of Health & Medical Sciences, St. George's University of London, London EC1V 0HB, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7344-2262

Funding

Australian Research Council FT220100253NHMRC/MNDRA Postgraduate Scholarship 1133541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective motor neurone disease (MND) management depends on patient and carer involvement in decisions about interventions and future care. Communication and cognitive impairments are common in MND and have under-recognised consequences for shared decision making and autonomy. This narrative conceptual review draws on empirical qualitative research with people living with MND and unpaid family carers and the literature specifically concerning shared decision making and communication in MND. Themes relating to communication, information use, and decision making styles were mapped onto an ALS/MND multidisciplinary decision making model. Enhancements to the model include expanding the decision making context beyond in clinical activity, embedding communication and cognitive skills and accommodations across stages, and acknowledging risks to collaborative decision making. Practical strategies for clinicians, healthcare services, people living with MND, and family carers are proposed to ensure that communication is foregrounded in-person-centred MND care. Observational and implementation research is required to evaluate and refine the proposed approaches.

Indexed as

amyotrophic lateral sclerosiscarerscommunication impairmentmotor neurone diseasenarrative reviewperson-centred careshared decision making

Identifiers

PMID42588274
PMCPMC13464704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.