Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42588184›Full record

ReviewNutrients2026

Food Supplements in Osteoarthritis: A Practical Framework for Discussing Evidence with Patients.

Matteo Briguglio, Thomas W Wainwright

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Matteo BriguglioIRCCS Ospedale Galeazzi-Sant'Ambrogio, Laboratory of Nutrition Sciences, 20157 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0801-2359
Thomas W WainwrightOrthopaedic Research Institute, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth BH12 5BB, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7860-2990

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of osteoarthritis (OA), a leading cause of disability worldwide, is increasingly integrating nutritional strategies that appear to offer the opportunity to significantly improve the quality of care. Patients are also aware of this and often seek clarification and advice from OA professionals. However, it is still too early to formulate definitive recommendations, as the scientific evidence is still heterogeneous. This can create a gap between patients' need for clear guidance and the necessarily prudent communication of professionals. As a result, some patients may make decisions on their own, forgoing the opportunity to receive nutritional care personalised according to their dietary habits and disease severity. This commentary presents an expert interpretation of the currently available evidence and proposes a practical framework to support clinical discussions with patients. It is not intended as a formal clinical practice guideline but aims to help OA professionals navigate conversations about the role that nutritional strategies may play in disease management.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsNutrition TherapyOsteoarthritisEvidence-Based MedicineHumanscomplementary therapiesdietary supplementationsenhanced recovery after surgerynutraceuticalsnutrition therapyorthopaedic surgeryosteoarthritispatient reported outcome measuresprofessional patient relationshipquality of health care

Identifiers

PMID42588184
PMCPMC13468663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.