Observational studyNutrients2026
Environmental and Clinical Determinants of Vitamin D Status in Breast Cancer Patients: A Multivariable Analysis.
Observational study in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesVitamin D deficiency is commonly observed in patients with breast cancer and may affect disease course and treatment outcomes. The determinants of vitamin D status in this population remain incompletely understood, particularly with respect to lifestyle, psychosocial, and tumour-related factors. The aim of this study was to identify environmental and clinical factors associated with serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations in women with breast cancer, with particular emphasis on dietary patterns, psychological distress, sleep quality, and tumour molecular subtype.
methodsA cross-sectional observational study was conducted among 101 women with histopathologically confirmed invasive breast cancer, recruited at the St. John of Dukla Oncology Centre of the Lublin Region (COZL) in Lublin, Poland, between 2018 and 2019. Serum 25(OH)D concentrations were measured by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA; Roche Diagnostics) within 2-8 weeks after surgical treatment. Clinical and lifestyle data were collected using standardised questionnaires and medical records. Dietary patterns were assessed with the KomPAN questionnaire (pro-healthy diet index pHDI-10 and non-healthy diet index nHDI-14). Psychological distress was measured with the Distress Thermometer. Multiple linear regression with backward stepwise elimination was applied to identify factors independently associated with of 25(OH)D concentration.
resultsInsufficient vitamin D status (25(OH)D < 30 ng/mL) was found in 56.4% of participants. The multivariable regression model was statistically significant (F(6,92) = 15.298;
conclusionsVitamin D status in patients with breast cancer is shaped by complex interactions among modifiable lifestyle factors and tumour characteristics. Targeted interventions addressing diet quality, psychological well-being, sleep health, and weight management may improve vitamin D status in this population. The association between molecular subtype and 25(OH)D concentrations warrants further prospective investigation. These findings should be interpreted with caution, as vitamin D supplementation and direct measures of sun exposure-both established determinants of 25(OH)D-could not be included as covariates and may account, at least in part, for the associations reported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.