ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Near-Infrared Hyperspectral Imaging for Non-Destructive Detection of Old Rice in Freshly Milled Rice.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adulteration of freshly milled rice with rice from older sources is a fraudulent and illegal practice that exploits consumers. The purpose of this study was to develop a rapid and non-destructive technique that can detect this adulteration of milled rice, using near-infrared hyperspectral imaging (NIR-HSI) in the wavelength range of 935-1720 nm. Adulterated samples were prepared by adding old and freshly milled rice at different levels, scanning the mixed samples, and comparing the results with 100% freshly milled rice samples. All samples were divided into calibration and prediction sets for the development of classification and calibration models. Spectral pretreatment methods were tested to develop the optimum models. For qualitative prediction, the best results for differentiation between freshly milled rice and adulterated samples using partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) yielded 96.15% accuracy, 92.86% sensitivity, and 100% specificity. For quantitative prediction, the best calibration model for determining the percentage of mixing with old rice using support vector machine regression (SVMR) yielded a coefficient of determination for prediction (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.