ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
AI-Driven Nondestructive Measurement Technologies for Meat Quality and Safety: A Review.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Meat Freshness Monitoring in the Modern Supply Chain: Analytical Advances, Smart Packaging, and Digital Integration.Food science & nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Meat quality and safety are critical aspects of global food security. However, traditional evaluation techniques, including sensory analysis and chemical and instrumental tests, are constrained by subjectivity, high time consumption, their destructive character, and susceptibility to bias. With rapid advances in sensor technologies and computational methods, there is a growing demand for the nondestructive, accurate, and fast measurement of meat quality and safety attributes. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) integrated with nondestructive sensing has emerged as a transformative paradigm, offering unparalleled capabilities for extracting quality information from complex datasets generated by various nondestructive sensing technologies. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of AI-driven nondestructive technologies for meat quality and safety assessment, focusing on the integration of machine learning and deep learning with various sensing techniques. Additionally, the review evaluates state-of-the-art algorithms and their performances and identifies deployment barriers, particularly calibration transfer, environmental sensitivity, reproducibility issues, sensor fouling, and generalization challenges across batches and processing plants. Furthermore, economic and regulatory constraints, including high sensor costs, small and medium enterprise (SME) adoption challenges, and alignment with HACCP/ISO frameworks that further limit commercial scalability, are discussed. Unlike previous reviews that primarily focus on individual sensing techniques, this review emphasizes the practical challenges associated with industrial implementation and the development of scalable solutions for real-world deployment. Finally, strategic research priorities and recommendations are highlighted to accelerate the industrial adoption of intelligent meat quality monitoring systems across the global meat industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.