Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42587852›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

AI-Driven Nondestructive Measurement Technologies for Meat Quality and Safety: A Review.

Lorna Bridget Alal, Juntae Kim, Yun-Kil Kwon, Sun-Moon Kang, Isa Kabenge, Byoung-Kwan Cho

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lorna Bridget AlalDepartment of Smart Agriculture Systems, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0009-0007-1034-6776
Juntae KimDepartment of Smart Agriculture Systems Machinery Engineering, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-5398-8839
Yun-Kil KwonXCore System Co., Ltd., Sejong 30141, Republic of Korea.
Sun-Moon KangAnimal Products Research and Development Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Wanju 55365, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3947-4337
Isa KabengeDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala P.O. Box 7062, Uganda.
Byoung-Kwan ChoDepartment of Smart Agriculture Systems, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8397-9853

Funding

Rural Development Administration PJ017041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meat quality and safety are critical aspects of global food security. However, traditional evaluation techniques, including sensory analysis and chemical and instrumental tests, are constrained by subjectivity, high time consumption, their destructive character, and susceptibility to bias. With rapid advances in sensor technologies and computational methods, there is a growing demand for the nondestructive, accurate, and fast measurement of meat quality and safety attributes. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) integrated with nondestructive sensing has emerged as a transformative paradigm, offering unparalleled capabilities for extracting quality information from complex datasets generated by various nondestructive sensing technologies. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of AI-driven nondestructive technologies for meat quality and safety assessment, focusing on the integration of machine learning and deep learning with various sensing techniques. Additionally, the review evaluates state-of-the-art algorithms and their performances and identifies deployment barriers, particularly calibration transfer, environmental sensitivity, reproducibility issues, sensor fouling, and generalization challenges across batches and processing plants. Furthermore, economic and regulatory constraints, including high sensor costs, small and medium enterprise (SME) adoption challenges, and alignment with HACCP/ISO frameworks that further limit commercial scalability, are discussed. Unlike previous reviews that primarily focus on individual sensing techniques, this review emphasizes the practical challenges associated with industrial implementation and the development of scalable solutions for real-world deployment. Finally, strategic research priorities and recommendations are highlighted to accelerate the industrial adoption of intelligent meat quality monitoring systems across the global meat industry.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceindustrial deploymentmeat qualitymeat safetynondestructive techniques

Identifiers

PMID42587852
PMCPMC13465338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.