ReviewCells2026
Mass Spectrometry in Allogeneic CAR-T Cell Manufacturing: From Cellular Starting Materials to Multi-Attribute Quality Control.
Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have demonstrated remarkable clinical efficacy in hematological malignancies, yet their broader application is constrained by manufacturing complexity and variability, particularly in autologous settings. The development of allogeneic CAR T-cell therapies offers a promising alternative by enabling scalable, "off-the-shelf" production; however, these approaches introduce additional challenges related to donor variability, genome editing, and product consistency. Robust analytical strategies are therefore required to ensure safety, efficacy, and batch-to-batch reproducibility. Conventional analytical methods, such as flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, provide targeted, high-confidence measurements of predefined cellular and soluble markers but are inherently limited in their ability to capture the full molecular and functional complexity of CAR T-cell products. In current manufacturing paradigms, these assays are typically deployed as isolated quality control readouts rather than as components of an integrated control strategy that links donor variability, gene-editing material quality, in-process metabolic state, final product critical quality attributes, and clinical biomarker responses. In this context, mass spectrometry (MS) has emerged as a powerful platform for high-dimensional molecular characterization, enabling analysis of gene-editing reagents, proteins, metabolites, lipids, and both culture and spent-media composition across the CAR T-cell manufacturing workflow. In this review, we examine the various applications and tools of MS across key stages of the allogeneic CAR T-cell workflow, including donor characterization, analysis of gene-editing materials, in-process culture monitoring, drug product quality assessment, and post-infusion biomarker evaluation. Collectively, these approaches demonstrate the potential of MS-driven analytics to address current limitations in CAR T-cell manufacturing by improving process understanding, enabling comprehensive quality assessment, and supporting regulatory decision-making. The integration of MS into CAR T-cell workflows may ultimately facilitate the development of more consistent, scalable, and effective cell therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.