Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42587707›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Superior Cluneal Nerve Entrapment: Methodological Considerations. Comment on Iudicelli et al. The Role of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound in Detecting Superior Cluneal Nerve Entrapment: Biomechanical Insights in Chronic Low Back Pain-A Pilot Study.

Busra Sezer Kiral

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Busra Sezer KiralPhysical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Istanbul Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34186, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0338-8461

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Superior cluneal nerve (SCN) entrapment is an underrecognized cause of chronic low back pain, and musculoskeletal ultrasound has recently gained attention as a potential diagnostic tool. In a recent pilot study, an indirect ultrasonographic triad consisting of thoracolumbar fascia thickening, iliac crest enthesophytes, and Copeman nodules was proposed as a potential diagnostic indicator of SCN entrapment. In this comment, we discuss several anatomical and methodological considerations regarding the ultrasonographic evaluation of SCN entrapment. Based on previous anatomical studies and our own ultrasonographic experience, we emphasize that the principal role of ultrasonography in SCN entrapment is to facilitate accurate ultrasound-guided diagnostic nerve blocks by identifying the target anatomy. Although direct visualization of the SCN may provide supportive anatomical information, the diagnosis should remain based on the clinical presentation and, when indicated, confirmation by an ultrasound-guided diagnostic nerve block. Further multicenter prospective studies are needed to establish standardized ultrasonographic diagnostic criteria for SCN entrapment.

Indexed as

chronic low back painmusculoskeletal ultrasoundsuperior cluneal nerve

Identifiers

PMID42587707
PMCPMC13464954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.