Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42587424›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2026

Opting in to paid work in old age.

Loretta G Platts, Kevin E Cahill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Loretta G PlattsDepartment of Psychology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3243-0262
Kevin E CahillCenter on Aging & Work, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, United States.

Funding

Swedish Research Council 2021-01099_VR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Older people's paid work takes on a distinctive character once retirement on an adequate pension has become a realistic alternative. Rather than retiring, these older workers are opting in to the labor market by continuing their preexisting work arrangements, adapting them, or seeking new jobs. This way of working-facilitated by old-age income security systems-merits both theoretical and empirical attention. The current paper offers a multidisciplinary account of the distinctive nature of these opt-in jobs and suggests potential conditions and mechanisms that underpin them. We make the case that these workers are no longer compelled to work for pay by financial necessity, as retirement income systems have removed or substantially eased breadwinning pressures, and that they are defying social conventions calling on them to retire. These opt-in older workers typically seek to maximize the intrinsic rewards of paid work while defending their hard-won freedom over their time and energy. Two mechanisms appear to generate the distinctive nature of these jobs: differential selection of older adults out of the labor market and changes in the nature of jobs held by people working in the years normally set aside for retirement. We outline the value of opt-in workers for developing gerontological theory and suggest several promising avenues for empirical research, including the influence of retirement income systems upon working lives, strategic interactions between employees and employers, and the changing priorities of older people themselves as they age.

Indexed as

AgingEmploymentRetirementSalaries and Fringe BenefitsAgedHumansIncomePensionsBridge employmentEncore careerPost-retirement workSocial inequalityThird age

Identifiers

PMID42587424
PMCPMC13537818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.