Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42587384›Full record

SynthesisCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2026

Relevance-Based Score for MIPD Model Selection: Systematic Review and External Evaluation of popPK Tacrolimus Models in Adult Transplant Recipients.

Samuel Baroudi, Bénédicte Franck, Jean-Baptiste Woillard, Ntobe-Bunkete Béni, Emmanuelle Comets, Florian Lemaitre

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samuel BaroudiInserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en santé, Environnement et Travail), UMR_S 1085, Univ. Rennes, Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2941-9499
Bénédicte FranckInserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en santé, Environnement et Travail), UMR_S 1085, Univ. Rennes, Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8150-3467
Jean-Baptiste WoillardDepartment of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacovigilance, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1695-0695
Ntobe-Bunkete BéniInserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en santé, Environnement et Travail), UMR_S 1085, Univ. Rennes, Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2623-306X
Emmanuelle CometsInserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en santé, Environnement et Travail), UMR_S 1085, Univ. Rennes, Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9150-9886
Florian LemaitreInserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en santé, Environnement et Travail), UMR_S 1085, Univ. Rennes, Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0908-3629

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selecting the most relevant models for model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) remains challenging, particularly when numerous population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models are available, making external evaluation of all candidates time- and resource-consuming. We aimed to develop and assess an adaptable relevance-based scoring methodology, illustrated with tacrolimus in adult transplant recipients. Candidate criteria were derived from published guidelines and external evaluations. A 23-item relevance score was developed, covering training dataset, study design, evaluation methodology, covariates, and parameter precision. For tacrolimus, a systematic literature review identified 28 models which were scored for relevance and externally evaluated using an independent dataset from Rennes University Hospital (86 patients). Predictive performances were assessed at individual and population levels using bias and imprecision metrics. Predicted and observed AUCs were compared against therapeutic thresholds. Models were then ranked using an external evaluation score (maximum 14 points) based on predefined acceptance limits for bias and imprecision. Correlations between relevance-based and external scores and ranks were assessed using Pearson and Spearman correlations. The mean relevance score was 22.3/56 (range: 6-38). Higher scores were associated with larger and richer datasets, prospective or multicentric designs, inclusion of clinically relevant covariates, and precise parameter estimates. Individual predictions showed acceptable bias and imprecision, whereas population predictions were consistently inaccurate. AUC concordance (56%-94%) was mainly limited by overestimation. Highest external score was 6/14. Correlation between relevance-based and external scores was moderate (Pearson = 0.56; Spearman = 0.61). This work provides a structured basis for popPK model selection and identified tacrolimus models suitable for MIPD applications.

Indexed as

Immunosuppressive AgentsModels, BiologicalTacrolimusAdultArea Under CurveHumansTransplant RecipientsImmunosuppressive AgentsTacrolimusexternal evaluationpharmacokineticsscoretacrolimustherapeutic drug monitoring

Identifiers

PMID42587384
PMCPMC13469177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.