ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2026
Buffer and salt dependent reassembly pathways of Myxococcus xanthus encapsulin.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Buffer and salt dependent reassembly pathways of Myxococcus xanthus encapsulin.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein cages that adopt multiple assembly states provide tractable systems for probing the mechanisms that govern icosahedral shell formation. The Myxococcus xanthus encapsulin shell protein assembles into either a T = 1 shell (60 subunits) or a T = 3 shell (180 subunits), making it an ideal model to investigate how solution conditions bias competing assembly pathways. Here, we examined the reassembly of M. xanthus encapsulin following complete urea-mediated disassembly, systematically varying buffer identity (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid [HEPES], Tris, or phosphate) and ionic strength (0-1M NaCl) at pH 7.5. Assembly products were analyzed by dynamic light scattering and size-exclusion chromatography, with selected fractions characterized by transmission electron microscopy. Buffer identity and salt concentration reproducibly determined the T = 1 versus T = 3 distribution: phosphate buffer strongly favored T = 1 under all conditions, Tris at low ionic strength promoted T = 3 formation, and increasing NaCl progressively shifted outcomes toward T = 1 or unassembled subunits depending on the buffer. Assembled populations remained fixed upon shell closure and did not interconvert upon buffer exchange, demonstrating kinetic trapping. Interface analysis of both assembly states reveals that T = 3 formation requires reversible sampling of multiple weak contacts following formation of one dominant interface, whereas T = 1 relies on repeated formation of a single hydrophobic interface. Together, these results show that M. xanthus encapsulin assembly proceeds through competing kinetic pathways, with the outcome determined by how solution conditions modulate the reversibility and selectivity of early subunit encounters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.