ArticleMaternal health, neonatology and perinatology2026
Efficacy of perineal massage in second stage of labour for prevention of perineal trauma: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh-quality intra-partum care is crucial for all expectant mothers to ensure safe delivery and favourable postpartum recovery. Vaginal delivery when associated with perineal trauma makes postpartum period painful and increases risk of long-term morbidity. Perineal trauma has been reported to be more common among Asian women. Interventions which minimise the perineal trauma will enhance the experience of motherhood. Various strategies have been explored but there is no firm consensus on their usage. We conducted this study to evaluate the effectiveness of perineal massage during the second stage of labor in reducing perineal trauma.
methodsA randomised controlled study was conducted at a referral centre. Four hundred and fifty women were randomised into two groups of 225 women. Second stage of labor was managed with perineal massage along with fetal head flexion and perineal support in group A and only fetal head flexion and perineal support was given in group B. The rate of intact perineum, episiotomy, perineum tears, duration of second stage and acceptability of perineal massage were compared between the 2 groups.
resultsGroup A showed a significantly higher rate of intact perineum (p = 0.03) and a lower rate of episiotomies (p = 0.04). Overall rates of perineal tears between groups were not statistically different (p = 0.95). The duration of the second stage of labor was significantly shorter in Group A (p < 0.001). Women experienced significant perineal discomfort but 81.8% said they would opt for it in the subsequent delivery.
conclusionPerineal massage is a simple, easily applicable and cost-effective technique. It reduced episiotomy rates and duration of second stage of labor significantly. Its routine use can be offered with appropriate counselling to all labouring women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.