ArticleBMC chemistry2026
Spectrophotometric determination of cefepime and enmetazobactam in pharmaceutical formulations and human plasma using chemometric modeling, metaheuristic wavelength selection, and comprehensive sustainability assessment.
Article in BMC chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The recently introduced cefepime-enmetazobactam (CEF-ENM) combination requires reliable analytical methods for pharmaceutical quality control and proof-of-concept bioanalytical evaluation. Existing methods are predominantly chromatographic and rely on large volumes of organic solvents, costly instrumentation, and high energy consumption. In this work, a UV spectrophotometric approach integrated with chemometric analysis was established for the simultaneous quantification of CEF and ENM in pharmaceutical formulations and processed post-extraction-fortified human plasma. Calibration samples were prepared according to the Brereton multilevel experimental design, whereas an independent external validation set was constructed using the Maximin Distance Design (MMD) algorithm. The analytical performance of six chemometric models (CLS, PCR, PLS, GA-PLS, FA-PLS, and MCR-ALS) was evaluated to resolve the severe spectral overlap between both analytes. Matrix-specific calibration models were developed for processed plasma samples. The developed models showed excellent analytical performance, with MCR-ALS providing the highest predictive accuracy and robustness. Sustainability was comparatively evaluated using the integrated Multi-color Assessment (MA) Tool together with complementary greenness metrics. The proposed method demonstrated superior overall sustainability compared with previously reported chromatographic methods while maintaining reliable quantitative performance. The proposed approach offers a rapid, cost-effective, and environmentally sustainable alternative for routine pharmaceutical quality control and proof-of-concept evaluation in processed post-extraction-fortified human plasma. Further comprehensive bioanalytical validation is warranted to support routine clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.