Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42587305›Full record

ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2026

The use of high-velocity, low-amplitude techniques in paediatric osteopathic care: two multinational cross-sectional surveys on clinical practice and educational curricula.

Patrick L S van Dun, Lucas Bohlen, Julie Ellwood, Ana Paula A Ferreira, Amie Steel, Jerry Draper-Rodi, Paul Vaucher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patrick L S van DunResearch Committee, Osteopathy Europe, Brussels, Belgium. patrick.vandun@osteopathie.be.
Lucas BohlenResearch Committee, Osteopathy Europe, Brussels, Belgium.
Julie EllwoodResearch Committee, Osteopathy Europe, Brussels, Belgium.
Ana Paula A FerreiraResearch Committee, Osteopathy Europe, Brussels, Belgium.
Amie SteelSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.
Jerry Draper-RodiResearch Committee, Osteopathy Europe, Brussels, Belgium.
Paul VaucherClinical-Human Research Department, Foundation COME Collaboration, Pescara, Italy.

Funding

Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (#FT220100610)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUp to one osteopathic consultation out of four involve infants and children. Although the clinical effectiveness of osteopathic care in paediatric populations remains inconclusive, available evidence suggests that it is generally safe. In contrast, high velocity, low amplitude technique (HVLA) has been associated with potential adverse effects. To inform a professional position on the use of HVLA techniques in paediatric care, this study investigated (1) the use of HVLA techniques by osteopathic practitioners in the treatment of infants, children, and adolescents, and (2) the extent to which HVLA techniques are included in osteopathic training programmes for these paediatric age groups.

methodsTwo online cross-sectional surveys were conducted. The first targeted osteopathic practitioners and consisted of seven close-ended questions. The second survey was directed at osteopathic education institutes (OEIs) in Europe, Australia, Brazil, Israel, and New Zealand and consisted of three close-ended questions. Surveys were implemented via REDCap and made available in 11 languages. Participants were recruited between October 2025 and January 2026.

resultsAmong responding practitioners (n = 2607, response rate: 10.7%), 6.5% reported using HVLA in newborns or infants, 43.5% in children, and 78.3% in adolescents. Most respondents (54%) who apply HVLA to newborns and infants reported doing so "rarely". Of the 62 responding OEIs (response rate: 30.7%), 91.4% offered osteopathic paediatric education; however, only 4.8% reported teaching HVLA for newborns and infants, 11.3% for children, and 56.4% for adolescents. Most respondents (70.2%) held an HVLA-opposed stance. Among the distinct practitioner profiles identified in the prioritisation of conditions for HVLA use in newborns and infants, the precaution-informed stance (11.2%) was the most strongly associated with paediatric practice and with the highest reported HVLA use in this age group.

conclusionsMost respondents did not use HVLA in newborns and infants, with utilisation increasing in older paediatric age groups, and the majority expressed opposition to paediatric HVLA. More permissive stances were associated with greater HVLA use and more training. The generalisability of the findings is limited by potential coverage and self-selection bias, possible duplicate responses, and the low and variable response rate to the survey of osteopathic practitioners. Given its continued application, an evidence-based position statement and robust research on the safety and effectiveness of HVLA in paediatrics are urgently needed.

Indexed as

CurriculumManipulation, OsteopathicOsteopathic MedicinePediatricsPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdolescentAustraliaChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleHumansInfantMaleOsteopathic PhysiciansAdolescentChildCross-sectional studiesInfantManipulationOsteopathic

Identifiers

PMID42587305
PMCPMC13471349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.