ArticleBMC emergency medicine2026
Spatial heterogeneity in risk-adjusted return of spontaneous circulation after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the urbanization-adjusted RACA model.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRegistry-based benchmarking of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) requires well-calibrated risk adjustment across Emergency Medical Services (EMS) systems. Existing risk-adjustment models, however, do not account for urbanization-related heterogeneity, which may contribute to systematic urbanization-stratified miscalibration, bias cross-system benchmarking, and misdirect quality improvement. We developed and validated an urbanization-adjusted ROSC after cardiac arrest (URACA) by incorporating Eurostat's Degree of Urbanisation (DEGURBA) into RACA and assessed whether it improves calibration across urbanization levels without compromising discrimination.
methodsUsing 2014-2023 German Resuscitation Registry data, we identified 145,780 adult (≥18 years) out-of-hospital cardiac arrests and randomly split cases into development and validation cohorts. DEGURBA was recoded as metropolises (≥500,000 inhabitants), cities (<500,000), and non-urban areas (all others). We refitted RACA and fitted URACA using logistic regression with multiple imputation for missing values. In validation, we assessed calibration (calibration belts), discrimination (area under receiver operating characteristic curve; AUROC), prediction error (Brier score), and reclassification (continuous net reclassification improvement; cNRI).
resultsRefitted RACA exhibited urbanization-stratified miscalibration, overpredicting in non-urban areas and underpredicting in metropolises and cities. URACA reduced these systematic deviations: in non-urban areas, predicted ROSC closely matched observed ROSC across the full risk range, and in metropolises and cities, the mid-range underprediction was resolved. Discrimination and overall accuracy were unchanged (AUROC 0.735 vs 0.737; Brier 0.202 for both), while reclassification improved (cNRI 9.4%).
conclusionsURACA mitigates urbanization-stratified calibration bias while preserving discrimination, enhancing the comparability of risk-adjusted ROSC benchmarking across EMS systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.