ArticleBehavior research methods2026
Food, mammals, & countries: Stimuli, their pairwise similarities, and MDS dimension values for modeling judgment, categorization, and memory in three real-world domains.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three comprehensive sets of naturalistic stimuli, each with pairwise similarity ratings and multidimensional scaling (MDS)-based feature representations are presented, freely available on the corresponding OSF repository of this project under a CC-BY-SA-NC-4.0 license. The primary contribution of this work is the provision of these well-curated naturalistic stimulus sets and their associated high-quality similarity data as a resource for the research community. The sets include 80 representative items from three domains - foods, mammals, and countries - that can be used across cognitive research areas such as categorization, multiple-cue probability learning, judgment, decision-making, memory, and metamemory. Based on over 280,000 similarity judgments from
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.