ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2026
Revisiting thoracic splanchnic nerve anatomy: implications for thoracoscopic splanchnicectomy and pain management.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe thoracic splanchnic nerves-greater (GSN), lesser (LSN), and least (lSN)-are important targets in thoracic surgery and image-guided interventions, yet detailed quantitative characterization of their anatomy remains limited. This study aimed to define the morphometry, segmental origins, and anatomical variability of these nerves to improve understanding of clinically relevant anatomy.
methodsEighty sets of thoracic splanchnic nerves from 42 formalin-embalmed donors were dissected. Segmental contributions were recorded and classified, and morphometric measurements were obtained relative to the sympathetic trunk, transverse processes, midline, and aorta. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate differences in morphometric parameters by configuration, laterality, and sex.
resultsThe GSN was present in 100% of specimens, the LSN in 93.75%, and the lSN in 28.75%. Substantial variability in segmental origin was observed. The most common GSN configuration was T6-T10 (42.5%), whereas the classically described T5-T9 pattern occurred in only 8.75% of cases. For the LSN, T11-T12 (34.67%) and T11 alone (29.33%) were the most common origins, while only 13.33% conformed to the traditionally described T10-T11 pattern. The lSN most commonly originated from T12 (78.26%). Statistically significant differences in nerve position and dimensions were identified with respect to laterality and sex.
conclusionThoracic splanchnic nerve anatomy is highly variable, and classically described segmental patterns represent a minority of cases. These findings provide clinically relevant morphometric data that may improve localization during thoracoscopic surgery, splanchnic nerve block, and other interventions involving the thoracic sympathetic system while reducing the risk of iatrogenic injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42587177What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.