SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2026
SGLT2 inhibitors and secondary polycythemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of hematologic effects in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Synthesis in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are widely used in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) due to their survival benefits. However, these agents are associated with increases in hemoglobin (Hgb) and hematocrit (Hct), raising concern for secondary polycythemia or erythrocytosis and potential thrombotic risk. The clinical significance of these hematologic changes remains unclear.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were searched up to February 2026 for studies evaluating the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on hematologic parameters in adults with T2DM. Patients with primary polycythemia, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), or heart failure were excluded. Primary outcomes were changes in Hgb and Hct. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of erythrocytosis/polycythemia and thrombotic events.
resultsA total of 10 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising randomized and observational studies, with follow-up ranging from 8 weeks to 24 months. SGLT2 inhibitors, including empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and canagliflozin, were consistently associated with increases in Hgb and Hct. Across three randomized controlled trials, SGLT2 inhibitors significantly increased hematocrit (3 studies, 171 patients, pooled mean difference + 2.29%, 95% CI 1.48 to 3.09) and hemoglobin (3 studies, 171 patients, pooled mean difference + 0.51 g/dL, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.74) compared with placebo. Real-world data (9,646 patients) reported an increase in polycythemia prevalence from 2.4% to 9.7%, with severe cases in 1.4% of patients. Limited data suggested a potential association with thrombotic events, with one observational study of 100 patients with JAK2-unmutated erythrocytosis reporting a 10% event rate. Hematologic changes were observed early after treatment initiation and appeared reversible following drug discontinuation.
conclusionsIn patients with type 2 diabetes, ESRD, or heart failure, SGLT2 inhibitor use is associated with consistent increases in hemoglobin and hematocrit. Although these effects may contribute to cardiovascular benefit, a subset of patients may develop clinically significant erythrocytosis. Clinicians should be aware of this potential effect and monitor high-risk individuals. Larger prospective studies are needed to better define the clinical significance of these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.