Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42587089›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Machine-learning prediction of biomass chemical composition using derivative thermogravimetric data of different biomass feedstocks.

Satyajit Pattanayak, Dipankar Saha, Chanchal Loha, Kush Kumar Dewangan, Io Antonopoulou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Satyajit PattanayakBiochemical Process Engineering, Division of Chemical Engineering, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, 97187, Luleå, Sweden. spsatyanayak@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9463-2102
Dipankar SahaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering, SR University, Warangal, 506371, India.
Chanchal LohaEnergy Research Technology Group, CSIR-Central Mechanical Engineering Research Institute, Durgapur, West Bengal, 713209, India.
Kush Kumar DewanganDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, West Bengal, 711103, India.
Io AntonopoulouBiochemical Process Engineering, Division of Chemical Engineering, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, 97187, Luleå, Sweden. io.antonopoulou@ltu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The behaviour of biomass in bioenergy and biorefinery processes is determined by its contents of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. The conventional wet chemical methods used to determine these fractions are reliable but time-consuming and laborious. This study attempts to determine whether these fractions can be adequately predicted from derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) data alone. A total of 75 biomass samples, including bamboo, agricultural residues, shells, and binary blends, were used. In addition, we calculated 13 simple, physically meaningful descriptors from each DTG curve (67 points from 27 to 687 °C), including peak height and temperature, areas under fixed-temperature windows, and area ratios. We trained seven algorithms, one for each component: Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Ridge, Partial Least Squares, Support Vector Regression, and k-Nearest Neighbours. All models were evaluated using nested leave-one-out cross-validation, with parameters optimised in the loop, and model stability was assessed with repeated fivefold cross-validation. The engineered descriptors improved every component. Cellulose was predicted with moderate accuracy (cross-validated R

Indexed as

BiomassMachine LearningBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsCelluloseLigninPolysaccharidesPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestThermogravimetryCellulosehemicelluloseLigninPolysaccharidesBiomassCelluloseCross-validationDerivative thermogravimetryFeature engineeringHemicelluloseLigninMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID42587089
PMCPMC13469630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.