Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42586978›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

A Benchmark Dataset of Agricultural Weather Stations over the Contiguous United States for Evapotranspiration Applications.

Christian Dunkerly, John M Volk, Sayantan Majumdar, Justin L Huntington, Richard G Allen, Christopher Pearson, Yeonuk Kim, Charles G Morton, Blake A Minor, Peter ReVelle and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Christian DunkerlyDesert Research Institute, Division of Hydrologic Sciences, Reno, Nevada, USA.
John M VolkDesert Research Institute, Division of Hydrologic Sciences, Reno, Nevada, USA. john.volk@dri.edu.
Sayantan MajumdarDesert Research Institute, Division of Hydrologic Sciences, Reno, Nevada, USA.
Justin L HuntingtonDesert Research Institute, Division of Hydrologic Sciences, Reno, Nevada, USA.
Richard G AllenUniversity of Idaho, Kimberly, Idaho, USA.
Christopher PearsonDesert Research Institute, Division of Hydrologic Sciences, Reno, Nevada, USA.
Yeonuk KimDesert Research Institute, Division of Hydrologic Sciences, Reno, Nevada, USA.
Charles G MortonDesert Research Institute, Division of Hydrologic Sciences, Reno, Nevada, USA.
Blake A MinorDesert Research Institute, Division of Hydrologic Sciences, Reno, Nevada, USA.
Peter ReVelleDesert Research Institute, Division of Hydrologic Sciences, Reno, Nevada, USA.
Ayse KilicUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln, School of Natural Resources, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
Forrest MeltonNASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA.
Adam J PurdyNASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA.
Todd G CaldwellDesert Research Institute, Division of Hydrologic Sciences, Reno, Nevada, USA.

Funding

California State University Agricultural Research Institute 21-01-106NASA Western Water Applications Office 80NSSC23K0836National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Applied Science Program NNX12AD05ANational Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Applied Science Program NNX17AF53GNIEHS NIH HHS 27398C0007United States Geological Survey Water Resources Research Institute G22AC00584-00USGS Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Units (CESU) G23AC00568USGS-NASA Landsat Science Team 140G0118C0007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Agricultural weather data are fundamental for the accurate estimate of evapotranspiration (ET), irrigation scheduling, and water-use accounting. In particular, reference ET provides a standardized atmospheric demand for water loss from a hypothetical well-watered grass (ETo) or alfalfa (ETr); however, weather stations may not adequately represent such climatic conditions. Weather data commonly contain errors from poor siting, sensor drift, and network management deficiencies. No standardized dataset exists over the contiguous United States (CONUS). Systematic errors affect ETo/ETr calculations and derived products. Notably, satellite-based platforms like OpenET require agricultural weather data to bias correct gridded reference ET to interpolate between satellite overpasses. CONUS-AgWeather is a benchmark dataset of daily agricultural weather data (precipitation, solar radiation, air temperature, humidity, wind speed, ETo, ETr) from 793 stations. This dataset contains 4,191,808 days (11,484 station-years, 1981-2020) and was produced through standardized and systematic quality control procedures and open-source software packages for time series inspection, outlier detection, corrections, and ETo/ETr calculations. CONUS-AgWeather is intended primarily to support OpenET in the Western U.S. but has broader applications.

Identifiers

PMID42586978
PMCPMC13470187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.