Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42586775›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2026

Soil Microbiome Predator Diversity Outperforms Nitrogen Addition in Boosting Plant Biomass via Bacterial Community Shifts.

Alejandro Berlinches de Gea, Joshua Both, Nina Haas, Rutger A Wilschut, Florian Wichern, Stefan Geisen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alejandro Berlinches de GeaLaboratory of Nematology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4278-8628
Joshua BothLaboratory of Nematology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0002-8795-6752
Nina HaasLaboratory of Nematology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2330-6734
Rutger A WilschutLaboratory of Nematology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2559-9799
Florian WichernSoil Science and Plant Nutrition, Sustainable Food Systems Research Centre, Rhine-Waal University of Applied Sciences, Kleve, Germany.
Stefan GeisenLaboratory of Nematology, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0734-727X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) is crucial for plant growth, but its overuse harms biodiversity. Increasing soil biodiversity might provide the means to reduce N inputs, but experimental evidence for this paradigm shift is limited. Using microbiome predators (protists and nematodes) that shape microbiome composition and participate in N cycling, we examined how interactions between their diversity and N addition affect Cannabis sativa growth. The addition of microbiome predators increased plant biomass by up to 53%, irrespective of diversity level, with effects reaching up to 60% under higher microbiome predator diversity. This biomass increase was primarily associated with changes in bacterial community composition and enriching functions related to carbon and N cycling. In contrast, N input played a greater role in determining plant and soil nutrient content. These findings suggest that microbiome predators determine plant biomass in a diversity and N-specific manner, showing the pivotal role of soil biodiversity in enhancing plant performance and serving as promising tools to mitigate N inputs.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaNematodaNitrogenSoil MicrobiologyAnimalsBacteriaBiodiversityBiomassSoilNitrogenSoil

Identifiers

PMID42586775
PMCPMC13467663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.