ArticleBMJ case reports2026
Electrical storm after percutaneous coronary intervention for subacute anterior myocardial infarction with heart failure, treated with multidisciplinary therapy.
Article in BMJ case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrical storm (ES) following acute coronary syndrome is rare but often fatal. A man in his early 70s experienced syncope and dyspnoea while playing golf, approximately 2 weeks after experiencing back pain. He was diagnosed with subacute anterior myocardial infarction based on pulmonary congestion, abnormal anterior wall movement and negative T waves in the precordial leads. Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent implantation was performed from the left main trunk to the proximal left anterior descending artery. On days 4-5 of hospitalisation, he developed recurrent ventricular fibrillation (VF) consistent with ES. High-rate pacing, deep sedation with mechanical ventilation and intra-aortic balloon pumping were initiated. To achieve more physiological pacing in the setting of severe left ventricular dysfunction, a coronary sinus lead was placed; however, ES developed shortly after catheter placement and required veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Continuous VF, unresponsive to multiple direct current shocks, was finally terminated by direct-current shock after landiolol administration. Subsequent percutaneous stellate ganglion blocks stabilised the arrhythmia, allowing successful weaning from mechanical circulatory support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.