ArticleBMJ open quality2026
System-level barriers to breast cancer screening completion in community-based navigation: lessons from a quality improvement initiative.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBlack and Latina women experience persistent breast cancer screening disparities. Patient navigation has demonstrated effectiveness in clinic-based populations, but evidence regarding navigation for women engaged through community outreach remains limited. LOCAL PROBLEM: In Northern New Jersey, late-stage breast cancer diagnosis rates among black women range from 38% to 44% compared with 27% among all women. Our institution lacked a systematic community-based outreach-to-screening navigation pathway.
methodsThis quality improvement initiative, conducted from December 2023 through December 2025 within a large integrated health system, leveraged existing Community Outreach and Engagement infrastructure across 230 community events, tracking a navigation process cascade from engagement through screening completion. Eligibility: women aged 40+ years without a mammogram in the past 12 months (United States Preventive Services Task Force/American Cancer Society).
interventionsThe programme included community outreach, eligibility screening, navigation enrolment, navigator follow-up (4-6 contact attempts over 4-6 weeks), scheduling support and social needs screening.
resultsThe programme engaged 1318 women; among 277 with demographic data, 80.9% identified as black or Latina and 78.8% were uninsured. Of 564 screened for eligibility, 333 (59.0%) enrolled in navigation. Contact success was 73% (210/288 with documented contact attempts in 2024). A critical gap emerged at scheduling: only 5 women (1.5% of enrolled) had mammography scheduled. Post-hoc analysis revealed navigators lacked operational authority to schedule appointments directly. Among 400 women completing social needs screening, 96.0% reported food insecurity.
conclusionsThis initiative identified an immediately actionable infrastructure gap: navigators lacked direct scheduling authority, appearing to be a critical barrier to translating engagement into completed care. The 96% food insecurity prevalence characterises a population facing compounding structural barriers, suggesting self-scheduling may be a structurally inequitable expectation. We propose that direct scheduling authority is a potentially necessary condition for effective community-based navigation-a hypothesis warranting prospective testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.