ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2026
Walking the tightrope: Balancing opposing cooperativities in dynein assembly.
Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The central region of the cytoplasmic dynein complex, comprising the intermediate chain (IC) and two light chains (LC8 and Tctex1), has eluded thorough quantitative characterization due to its participation in a highly coupled seven-state binding network. Although isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) is the gold standard for measuring binding thermodynamics, conventional analyses are limited to simple interaction schemes because individual isotherms contain insufficient information to resolve complex reaction networks. Here, we overcome this limitation by combining extensive experimental sampling with hierarchical Bayesian inference. We collected 39 ITC isotherms spanning eight experiment types and developed a global Bayesian framework integrating multiple datasets while explicitly accounting for concentration uncertainty. Using this approach, we fit the complete dataset to a mechanistic seven-state model, estimating 190 parameters, including 12 thermodynamic parameters while marginalizing over 178 nuisance parameters. Remarkably, this strategy yields 95% confidence intervals for thermodynamic values as narrow as 0.05 kcal/mol and back-propagates to nanomolar precision in effective concentrations, even when experimental concentrations are in the hundreds of micromolar. The resulting thermodynamic landscape enables predictive modelling of assembly populations under different scenarios, including binding states inaccessible to standard ITC analyses. These results reveal previously unrecognized binding states that may play key roles in dynein cargo attachment and release. More broadly, this work reveals a form of "multi-cooperativity" governing dynein assembly and demonstrates how intensive experimentation coupled with modern statistical tools can resolve complex molecular systems beyond the reach of traditional biophysical techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.