Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42585528›Full record

ArticleRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2026

Sexual health knowledge, sources of information, and associated attitudinal disconnects among university students.

Abdulsamet Bağcı, Betül Battaloğlu İnanç

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abdulsamet BağcıMinistry of Health, Ordu State Hospital - Ordu, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0893-7080
Betül Battaloğlu İnançMuğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine - Muğla, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7478-5451

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate university students' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding sexual and reproductive health.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted using face-to-face questionnaires administered on a voluntary basis to university students aged 18-26 presenting to the Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Kötekli No. 4 Family Health Center. Data were analyzed using International Business Machines Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Statistics version 26.0. Associations between categorical variables were evaluated using the chi-square and Fisher's exact tests.

resultsA total of 383 students participated in the study (55.4% female, n=212; 44.6% male, n=171). Of the participants, 42.3% reported having sexual experience, which was significantly higher among males (p=0.002). The most common source of information on sexual and reproductive health was the internet (65.3%). The best-known family planning method was the condom (98.7%). The most commonly known sexually transmitted infection was human ımmunodeficiency virus/acquired ımmunodeficiency syndrome, and the most frequently reported symptom was genital discharge.

conclusionUniversity students' level of knowledge regarding sexual and reproductive health is insufficient, and this gap suggests that knowledge alone is insufficient to drive behavior change, and that sociocultural and cognitive barriers-such as stigma, perceived norms, and risk misperception-play a mediating role.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeReproductive HealthSexual BehaviorSexual HealthStudentsAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSexually Transmitted DiseasesSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyUniversities

Identifiers

PMID42585528
PMCPMC13450998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.