Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42585510›Full record

ArticleCadernos de saude publica2026

[From text to scene: legal devices and care trajectories in the adoption of children with disabilities].

Luciano Silveira Pacheco de Medeiros, Thiago Ferreira Abreu, Luciano Garcia Lourenção, Giovana Calcagno Gomes, Clarice Alves Bonow

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luciano Silveira Pacheco de MedeirosUniversidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9679-3134
Thiago Ferreira AbreuUniversidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7353-3081
Luciano Garcia LourençãoUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1240-4702
Giovana Calcagno GomesUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2464-1537
Clarice Alves BonowUniversidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9918-9234

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze, through Critical Discourse Analysis, how five legal devices are activated, blocked, or reconfigured in the care trajectories of adoptive families of children with disabilities and with what effects on participation, predictability, comfort and continuity. This is a qualitative, analytical-descriptive study; with 11 caregivers. Semi-structured face-to-face interviews were conducted between 2023 and 2024, transcribed and analyzed by the three-dimensional model. It was found that normative texts enter the scene through practices and statements that sometimes unlock, sometimes erode rights. Strategies of blocking, gatekeeping, bureaucratization of the difference and neutralization by the report were identified - associated with the drop in markers; and low-cost mediations - bridge professional, light protocols, transparency of queues and reasonable adjustments agreed upon - associated with the increase in markers. Variations appeared by family arrangement and institutional scope. The re-textualization of the provisions depends on the definition of the situation and the negotiation of roles; when affiliation is publicized and coordination exists, paths are shortened and anxieties decrease; when the revolving door based on a report prevails, rescheduling and "new beginnings" multiply. It was concluded that the caregiver matters, but how the network responds matters just as much. It is recommended to institute a bridge professional, co-construct light protocols and reasonable adjustments, and ensure transparency of queues as a minimum infrastructure to transform a right provided for into a right lived; It is suggested to expand scenarios and include professional voices in future studies.

Indexed as

AdoptionCaregiversChildren with DisabilitiesBrazilChildFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID42585510
PMCPMC13460896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.