Trial reportDental press journal of orthodontics2026
Comparative evaluation of RANKL and OPG levels in gingival crevicular fluid and saliva during orthodontic treatment using thermoformed and direct-printed aligners.
Trial report in Dental press journal of orthodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOrthodontic tooth movement (OTM) is regulated by alveolar bone remodeling through the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) axis. Clear plastic aligners (CPAs), available as thermoformed and direct-printed variants, differ in force delivery and material properties, influencing biomarker responses.
objectiveThis prospective pilot randomized study compared salivary and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) levels of RANKL and OPG during treatment with thermoformed and direct-printed aligners, and evaluated correlations between saliva and GCF. MATERIAL AND
methodsEight healthy adults (18-40 years) requiring orthodontic treatment were randomly assigned to thermoformed or direct-printed aligners. GCF and unstimulated saliva were collected at baseline and at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 weeks. RANKL and OPG were quantified using ELISA, and data were analyzed with SPSS v21.0 (IBM, USA).
resultsThermoformed aligners exhibited a peak in GCF RANKL at 3 weeks, followed by a decline at 6 weeks. Direct-printed aligners showed a gradual reduction, with significantly lower RANKL at 4 and 6 weeks (p < 0.05). OPG levels were consistently higher in the direct-printed group across all time points in saliva and GCF (p < 0.05). Salivary OPG strongly correlated with GCF OPG at baseline, 3, and 6 weeks, while RANKL correlations were higher during later treatment phases.
conclusionAligner types elicited biomarker responses consistent with bone remodeling. Direct-printed aligners demonstrated a trend toward a more stable, OPG-dominant biological response. These findings should be interpreted cautiously, due to the pilot nature of the study. Saliva correlated with GCF, supporting its use as a non-invasive biomarker source. Larger longitudinal studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.