Observational studyCritical care science2026
The impact of socio-economic status on outcomes after unplanned intensive care unit admissions in Australia: a retrospective observational cohort study.
Observational study in Critical care science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the association between socioeconomic status and patient outcomes following unplanned intensive care unit admissions in Australia, using national data linked across public databases.
methodsWe conducted a national retrospective cohort study of all adult unplanned intensive care unit admissions in Australia between January 2017 and December 2019, using data from the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database. Socioeconomic status was determined using the Australian Bureau of Statistics' 2016 Index of Relative Socio-Economic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD), linked by patient postcode. The primary outcome was hospital mortality, adjusted for severity of illness, remoteness, year of admission, and intensive care unit, using a mixed-effects logistic regression model.
resultsA total of 245,867 intensive care unit admissions were included. Patients in the most disadvantaged quartile were less likely to be treated in tertiary or private hospitals. Still, there was otherwise no significant difference in demographic profile, intensive care unit interventions received, or reasons for admission. In the multivariate analysis, there were no significant differences in adjusted hospital mortality across IRSAD deciles (p = 0.3). DISCUSSION: In this national study, socioeconomic status was not associated with hospital mortality after adjustment for illness severity and hospital factors. These findings suggest that structural health system features, such as universal access to critical care in Australia, may mitigate the adverse effects of socioeconomic disadvantage among unplanned intensive care unit outcomes observed in other health systems. Further research is warranted to explore the pathways linking socioeconomic status, health access, and intensive care unit admission characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.