ArticlePloS one2026
Advancing health equity through simulation-based education for pre-health students.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBasic sciences are foundational for a career in the health professions. However, interest in the sciences wanes as students in the United States progress through K-12 education and reaches a nadir in the undergraduate years; this decline is particularly marked in underrepresented communities. In addition, difficulty in basic sciences may present as a barrier to entering the health professions. This study examines clinical simulation as an adjunct to lectures for promoting pre-health students' understanding, retention, and recall of the basic sciences as well as the feasibility and acceptability of this approach.
methodsThis study used a pretest/posttest design. Data collection occurred from March 2025 to August 2025. Following a traditional lecture, simulation was conducted on the following scenarios: malignant hyperthermia, opioid overdose, stroke, and cardiac emergency. Students assumed different roles within a healthcare team, allowing for checklist assessment of knowledge acquisition and decision-making abilities in a controlled setting. Written 20 item pre-simulation and post-simulation assessment data were analyzed descriptively and with t-tests to assess learning. Surveys and qualitative analysis from oral and written comments were used to assess acceptability and feasibility of simulation as an educational tool.
resultsClinical simulation participants included 43 pre-health students. There was a mean increase in written test scores following simulation, demonstrating significantly higher performance immediately after the simulation and 3 months later (M1 = 10.4 vs M2 = 16.4; p < 0.001; M1 = 10.4 vs M3 = 16.2, p < 0.001). Participants reported increased confidence (p < 0.001), most significantly in understanding stroke, heart attack, intraoperative emergency, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), opioid overdose, and administering naloxone. Comments suggested positive experiences with clinical simulation.
conclusionOur study demonstrated that clinical simulation is feasible, acceptable, and effective for pre-health education. This study reiterates the value of hands-on, interprofessional, and collaborative learning in student engagement and learning outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.