ArticlePloS one2026
What is socially constructed about race? A cross-national study of racial perception and categorization.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates the social construction of race by examining how racial categories are understood and applied by college students in Japan, Sweden, and the United States. Addressing a gap in empirical research on racial appraisal versus self-identification, the study employs a comparative and contextual approach using three types of data: open-ended definitions of race, racial and skin-color ascription tasks, and eye-tracking measures. The findings reveal both cross-contextual similarities and differences in how race is conceptualized and enacted. While respondents across all sites commonly defined race through physical characteristics and imposed categorization, contextual nuances etourismmerged-particularly in the use of cultural and ethnic framings. The study also demonstrates that the same faces were racially ascribed differently across settings, underscoring the fluidity of racial perception. Although eye-tracking data did not show variation in visual attention to facial features, the overall results provide compelling evidence for the contextual flexibility of racial categorization. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of race as a socially constructed phenomenon and highlight the need for further comparative research on racial perception and identity across diverse sociohistorical contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.