Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42585243›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Twelve quick tips for applying deep learning to animal sounds.

Burooj Ghani, Anne Leonie Baier, Vincent J Kalkman, Dan Stowell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Burooj GhaniUnderstanding Evolution Group, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Anne Leonie BaierUnderstanding Evolution Group, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0327-0378
Vincent J KalkmanBiodiversity Hotspots Group, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Dan StowellUnderstanding Evolution Group, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

Horizon Europe projects TETTRIs
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning is transforming the study of animal sound, enabling the automated identification of species, individuals, behaviors, and ecological patterns from large collections of recordings. While bioacoustic machine-learning models are growing more powerful, many biologists-ecologists, behavioral scientists, conservationists-and others working with acoustic data feel unprepared to navigate the computational workflows required to implement them. This article presents practical guidelines covering the full lifecycle of bioacoustic machine learning, including problem definition, data sourcing and annotation, model training, evaluation, deployment, reproducibility, and ethical considerations. Rather than providing a linear checklist, the guidelines outline an iterative framework for building science-led workflows, leveraging transfer learning and open-source tools, evaluating models based on the real-world cost of errors, and addressing domain shift under variable field conditions. Ultimately, this workflow demystifies the software-engineering process, providing a low-barrier and reproducible pathway for researchers applying machine learning to animal sound.

Indexed as

Deep LearningVocalization, AnimalAcousticsAnimalsComputational BiologyReproducibility of ResultsSoftwareSound

Identifiers

PMID42585243
PMCPMC13465828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.