Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42585229›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

De novo assembly and authentication of ancient DNA metagenomes with nf-core/mag.

James A Fellows Yates, Alexander Hübner, Maxime Borry, nf-core community, Christina Warinner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

James A Fellows YatesDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5585-6277
Alexander HübnerDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Maxime BorryDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
nf-core community
Christina WarinnerDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ancient DNA provides a direct window into the evolutionary processes that have shaped living microbial species today, as well as their now extinct relatives. Advances in both sequencing methods and de novo assembly techniques have not only resulted in a flood of modern metagenomic sequencing data, but they have also allowed palaeogenomicists to retrieve vast amounts of ancient DNA from past microorganisms, including species and strains without modern reference genomes. However, the degraded nature of ancient DNA means that the standard techniques of genome assembly developed for modern DNA are unlikely to perform effectively, unless heavily modified. This hinders the incorporation of ancient data into broader metagenomic studies that would otherwise benefit from having deep time information on the evolution of different microbial species. In this primer and protocol paper, we provide guidance on ways to adapt existing metagenomic de novo assembly processes, including data input, tools, and settings, in order to perform more robustly and effectively on ancient DNA. After assembly, we then further describe how ancient DNA contigs can be identified and validated. The key steps of ancient metagenomic assembly are now integrated in a dedicated ancient DNA mode in the established pipeline nf-core/mag. By introducing support for ancient DNA data in nf-core/mag, we aim to improve the ability of researchers to more regularly integrate de novo assembled ancient microbial data into broader metagenomics studies of microbial ecology and evolution.

Indexed as

DNA, AncientMetagenomeMetagenomicsSequence Analysis, DNAComputational BiologyHumansSoftwareDNA, Ancient

Identifiers

PMID42585229
PMCPMC13465854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.